W.I.M.P? PART 73

RDG Top Contributer Posts : 5681 Join date : 2010-03-01

QUESTION:
In stroke play, before playing a stroke, Cecil lifts a large stone lying next to his ball in a water hazard. The stone has obviously broken away from a nearby stone wall that is located outside the hazard. What is the ruling?

Subject: Re: W.I.M.P? PART 73 Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:08 am

I think it is similar as stone/banana skin in bunker....

Though the wall is man-made but the stone itself is natural unless it is bricks.

Subject: Re: W.I.M.P? PART 73 Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:14 am

It loose impediment so cannot remove. Agreed with NG alien

Committee Posts : 3617 Join date : 2010-02-18 Age : 55

What is W.I.M.P huh?

Subject: Re: W.I.M.P? PART 73 Thu Feb 10, 2011 3:49 am

tiley wrote:: What is W.I.M.P huh?

Already part 73 you still don't know? Seiko will cane your backside liao.... W.I.M.P? PART 73 16911

RDG Top Contributer Posts : 5681 Join date : 2010-03-01

tiley wrote:: What is W.I.M.P huh?

bro tiley, welcome to RDG!!!

can u briefly intro yourself since this is your 1st posting?

Committee Posts : 3617 Join date : 2010-02-18 Age : 55

W.I.M.P = what is my problem W.I.M.P? PART 73 229587

Subject: Re: W.I.M.P? PART 73 Thu Feb 10, 2011 5:07 am

W-I-M-P = What Is My Penalty ! Exclamation

Subject: Re: W.I.M.P? PART 73 Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:31 am

Seiko wrote:: QUESTION:
In stroke play, before playing a stroke, Cecil lifts a large stone lying next to his ball in a water hazard. The stone has obviously broken away from a nearby stone wall that is located outside the hazard. What is the ruling?

Quite honestly, I don't expect many correct answers for this one...........

The stone wall is an immovable obstruction, and the stone that broke away from this wall becomes a movable obstruction, and can be removed without penalty Very Happy

RDG Top Contributer Posts : 5681 Join date : 2010-03-01

ANSWER:

There is no penalty. Decision 24/6.

The stone is a movable obstruction, not a loose impediment, because it was once part of a man-made wall.

RDG Top Contributer Posts : 5681 Join date : 2010-03-01

kp wrote:

Seiko wrote:: QUESTION:
In stroke play, before playing a stroke, Cecil lifts a large stone lying next to his ball in a water hazard. The stone has obviously broken away from a nearby stone wall that is located outside the hazard. What is the ruling?

Quite honestly, I don't expect many correct answers for this one...........

The stone wall is an immovable obstruction, and the stone that broke away from this wall becomes a movable obstruction, and can be removed without penalty Very Happy

well done kp!! cheers

Subject: Re: W.I.M.P? PART 73 Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:45 am

Seiko wrote:

kp wrote:

Seiko wrote:: QUESTION:
In stroke play, before playing a stroke, Cecil lifts a large stone lying next to his ball in a water hazard. The stone has obviously broken away from a nearby stone wall that is located outside the hazard. What is the ruling?

Quite honestly, I don't expect many correct answers for this one...........

The stone wall is an immovable obstruction, and the stone that broke away from this wall becomes a movable obstruction, and can be removed without penalty Very Happy

well done kp!! cheers

Bro Seiko, we're 'amateur social rule official' where as Bro kp is the officially certified PRO rule official... Very Happy

RDG Top Contributer Posts : 5681 Join date : 2010-03-01

swing2sky wrote:

Seiko wrote:

kp wrote:

Seiko wrote:: QUESTION:
In stroke play, before playing a stroke, Cecil lifts a large stone lying next to his ball in a water hazard. The stone has obviously broken away from a nearby stone wall that is located outside the hazard. What is the ruling?

Quite honestly, I don't expect many correct answers for this one...........

The stone wall is an immovable obstruction, and the stone that broke away from this wall becomes a movable obstruction, and can be removed without penalty Very Happy

well done kp!! cheers

Bro Seiko, we're 'amateur social rule official' where as Bro kp is the officially certified PRO rule official... Very Happy

Well done NG!!! cheers

Subject: Re: W.I.M.P? PART 73 Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:07 am

Seiko wrote:

swing2sky wrote:

Seiko wrote:

kp wrote:

Seiko wrote:: QUESTION:
In stroke play, before playing a stroke, Cecil lifts a large stone lying next to his ball in a water hazard. The stone has obviously broken away from a nearby stone wall that is located outside the hazard. What is the ruling?

Quite honestly, I don't expect many correct answers for this one...........

The stone wall is an immovable obstruction, and the stone that broke away from this wall becomes a movable obstruction, and can be removed without penalty Very Happy

well done kp!! cheers

Bro Seiko, we're 'amateur social rule official' where as Bro kp is the officially certified PRO rule official... Very Happy

Well done NG!!! cheers

Seiko, why you said well done to me? I answered wrongly leh....and this post also not from me... you drunk is it? W.I.M.P? PART 73 472247

RDG Top Contributer Posts : 5681 Join date : 2010-03-01

Neutralgolfer wrote:

Seiko wrote:

swing2sky wrote:

Seiko wrote:

kp wrote:

Seiko wrote:: QUESTION:
In stroke play, before playing a stroke, Cecil lifts a large stone lying next to his ball in a water hazard. The stone has obviously broken away from a nearby stone wall that is located outside the hazard. What is the ruling?

Quite honestly, I don't expect many correct answers for this one...........

The stone wall is an immovable obstruction, and the stone that broke away from this wall becomes a movable obstruction, and can be removed without penalty Very Happy

well done kp!! cheers

Bro Seiko, we're 'amateur social rule official' where as Bro kp is the officially certified PRO rule official... Very Happy

Well done NG!!! cheers

Seiko, why you said well done to me? I answered wrongly leh....and this post also not from me... you drunk is it? W.I.M.P? PART 73 472247

haha..i think im drunk now!!!

Subject: Re: W.I.M.P? PART 73 Mon Feb 14, 2011 3:43 am

Neutralgolfer wrote:

Seiko wrote:

swing2sky wrote:

Seiko wrote:

kp wrote:

Seiko wrote:: QUESTION:
In stroke play, before playing a stroke, Cecil lifts a large stone lying next to his ball in a water hazard. The stone has obviously broken away from a nearby stone wall that is located outside the hazard. What is the ruling?

Quite honestly, I don't expect many correct answers for this one...........

The stone wall is an immovable obstruction, and the stone that broke away from this wall becomes a movable obstruction, and can be removed without penalty Very Happy

well done kp!! cheers

Bro Seiko, we're 'amateur social rule official' where as Bro kp is the officially certified PRO rule official... Very Happy

Well done NG!!! cheers

Seiko, why you said well done to me? I answered wrongly leh....and this post also not from me... you drunk is it? W.I.M.P? PART 73 472247

Seiko keep thinking of you....are you guys having....a... W.I.M.P? PART 73 951776

Subject: Re: W.I.M.P? PART 73 Mon Feb 14, 2011 4:21 am

swing2sky wrote:

Neutralgolfer wrote:

Seiko wrote:

swing2sky wrote:

Seiko wrote:

kp wrote:

Seiko wrote:: QUESTION:
In stroke play, before playing a stroke, Cecil lifts a large stone lying next to his ball in a water hazard. The stone has obviously broken away from a nearby stone wall that is located outside the hazard. What is the ruling?

Quite honestly, I don't expect many correct answers for this one...........

The stone wall is an immovable obstruction, and the stone that broke away from this wall becomes a movable obstruction, and can be removed without penalty Very Happy

well done kp!! cheers

Bro Seiko, we're 'amateur social rule official' where as Bro kp is the officially certified PRO rule official... Very Happy

Well done NG!!! cheers

Seiko, why you said well done to me? I answered wrongly leh....and this post also not from me... you drunk is it? W.I.M.P? PART 73 472247

Seiko keep thinking of you....are you guys having....a... W.I.M.P? PART 73 951776

Actually his mind is thinking of you...but becos I post so much... he accidentally typed my name....I clarified with seiko liao.... lol!

Subject: Re: W.I.M.P? PART 73 Mon Feb 14, 2011 6:57 am

Neutralgolfer wrote:

swing2sky wrote:

Neutralgolfer wrote:

Seiko wrote:

swing2sky wrote:

Seiko wrote:

kp wrote:

Seiko wrote:: QUESTION:
In stroke play, before playing a stroke, Cecil lifts a large stone lying next to his ball in a water hazard. The stone has obviously broken away from a nearby stone wall that is located outside the hazard. What is the ruling?

Quite honestly, I don't expect many correct answers for this one...........

The stone wall is an immovable obstruction, and the stone that broke away from this wall becomes a movable obstruction, and can be removed without penalty Very Happy

well done kp!! cheers

Bro Seiko, we're 'amateur social rule official' where as Bro kp is the officially certified PRO rule official... Very Happy

Well done NG!!! cheers

Seiko, why you said well done to me? I answered wrongly leh....and this post also not from me... you drunk is it? W.I.M.P? PART 73 472247

Seiko keep thinking of you....are you guys having....a... W.I.M.P? PART 73 951776

Actually his mind is thinking of you...but becos I post so much... he accidentally typed my name....I clarified with seiko liao.... lol!

Subject: Re: W.I.M.P? PART 73 Mon Feb 14, 2011 2:42 pm

» W.I.M.P ? PART 84 - Special Disgusting case edition....Part II
» W.I.M.P? PART 71
» W.I.M.P Part 54